Al Gore may have invented the internet, but I invented Facebook. Sure, I know it’s a ridiculous stretch. The straight scoop: I have been musing of late about the benefit of making of my life an open book. For instance, what if every time I spoke about another person, that person could see and hear my statement? That would no doubt mellow my words. Do you often sense that you are a different person depending on whom you are addressing? That can be a problem if you are suddenly with two people. Which you will you be then? Could that be the root of social anxiety? It is scary to be real with a whole bunch of different people all at once. Whom then might you be?
The obvious solution to this dilemma is Facebook, or something remarkably like it. Assiduous utilization of such an asset can and surely will force users toward an integration of self. Every comment must be weighed against the perceptions of everybody else, not just the person seated before you. Methinks it is a conspiracy to civilize an uncivil society. There have been worse plots. This one I kind of like!
I have been ruminating on such concepts ever since writing Gaze, that odd theory postulating that we create each other’s minds. The more I weigh the idea, the more I believe it.
* * *
Gaze ©
The gaze between persons is powerful. I have watched it work as people process the possibilities of relating. Because my mother taught me well how to read her eyes and face, I am adept at reading others’ faces. I look at you and see you looking at me. There is a lock. I read your feelings, as I feel my feelings, now the products of our interactive gaze. You read my feelings. I read you, reading me, reading you, reading me……..all the way to infinity. There is infinite depth in a gaze, like two mirrors reflecting between each other in endless images. I am changed by what I see in your gaze. I see that you perceive me to be an interesting, perhaps even capable, person. I read that and rejoice in your assessment. I am inspired to become an even more interesting and more capable person. You read my feelings of happiness and interest and appreciation and decide to like me. I see that you like me, and I feel even happier. You see my happiness and I see yours. We are pregnant with each others happiness. There is mutuality. That’s how strangers become friends.
Sometimes this ability can go awry. I gaze into your eyes, and a shadow congeals. You see in me something that foments concern. What is it that you feel? Pity? Sadness? Scorn? The general feeling of concern resolves into a more precise feeling. Let’s choose scorn as an example. There it is, right there on your face, waiting to be read and understood and inculcated into my own reality. Whatever the precise feeling, it creeps over your visage, overcoming neutral musculature to form a living depiction of your scorn. I see that formation, not as an objectification of one person’s emotive response, but as my perception of your feeling that created it, intertwined with my feeling that perceived it. I become “a person who is scorned” and incorporate that scorn as the truth of my being. I am changed. In this manner, emotion reaches across the space between us, much as nerves pass bundles of impulse across synaptic gaps to carry messages throughout a living body. Are we separate? Are we connected? Is there is an actual meeting of minds, and if there is, how is it accomplished?
A psychiatrist stuck in the strictures of diagnosis will cry “delusion”, but this is not the reading of minds. It is the experiencing of faces. There is no “grandeur” claimed here, unless it is for the whole world of consciousness. Life is indeed grand, whether in the real or in the abstract.
Ocular transmission is a viable hypothesis beyond the purview of homo-sapiens sapiens. Eye contact is extremely important even in animal training. Every type of creature is shown to have species specific rules for eye to eye communication. The horse, as a prey animal with side vision evolved to provide warning of impending attack, is very different than a dog, cousin to the wolf, who eats only when his pack has killed. A horse’s gaze is wary, and not very useful for establishing trust. The eyes may determine that I am not preparing to attack, but it is smell, sound and touch that make the friendship possible. The horse is a challenge, but well worth the concerted effort. The best buddy I ever had, offered me a neck to cry on, not a shoulder. He was a black Andalusian stallion who would stand very still while I warmed my hands beneath his unbelievably heavy mane and cried hot tears into that warm, safe, secret place. He would nicker softly, reaching around me, gathering me into the bulging curve of his neck, drawing me into a horsey hug.
While the evolving equine connection was something humans, on a horse by horse basis, initiated and perpetuated, wolf’s domestication as dog, was a cooperative venture, wherein dogs and humans came to need, respect, and yes, love each other, across species demarcation. The mechanism for our much celebrated inter-species communication? Eye to eye gaze is accepted as the primary path for dog and human interplay, a behavior that is unnatural to a dog, who traditionally relies on smell and touch to comprehend his own kind. We have taught the dog to interact in mutual gaze, in exactly the same way that humans see and read each others feelings. Who can resist the mournful look of a hungry dog, sitting beside his empty bowl, pouring all of his yearning into those well-deep eyes? My collie’s favorite ploy, should all else fail to move me to response, is to park her chin on my knee and look up at me through lowered lashes. How can I not succumb? Even my cat, who meows to attract my hazel gaze, relies on his pair of slitted golden globes to reach into my soul and work his kitty-cat will. Do our animals love us? Of course they do.
How far down the evolutionary ladder will this dog hunt? I doubt if the frog that I pulled out of the amphibian tank in Bio Lab 101 exchanged any meaningful insights with my fifteen year old self, but after regarding each other eye to eye that day, I doubt he was ever quite the same, a moot point considering that my class assignment required that I dismember him. On the other hand, I emerged from the experience a different Dorothy, one more aware of the beauty, strength, and fragility of life and more committed to its’ advocacy. When I looked into the eyes of that living frog, I beheld the intelligence of a sentient creature. That made of the living me a new person.
My thesis postulates: “We, the living, create each other’s minds, beginning with the first opening of infant eyes, and ending only when the light within fades and flickers out. That is the mechanism of our interwoven mystery. Together, we are the nervous system of universal life, a collective intelligence, merging truth of every sense into universal mind.”
***
I am swept along
the aching curve of time
toward a wiser “I”.
I wait and watch,
to meet the future “I” that comes,
and in the coming,
sees the “me” meeting the future wiser “you”,
seeing me, seeing you loving me,
loving you, loving me, loving you, loving me, loving you.. . . . . . . . . . .
_Dorothy Jeanette Martin 7-12-2011
Note: “ .. . . . . . . . . . . “ is a useful symbol for “progression to infinity”.